Africa's Century

The 21st century is for Africa. As an African child and Generation X by definition, i feel duty bound, in the journey of my life time, to contribute to the development of this burgeoning continent through my researched views stimulated by the fast paced and changing global socio-political and economic landscape.


About Me

My photo
An emerging African entrepreneur,strategist in the making, philosopher, revenue specialist, marketer and the community volunteer of note. My particular interests are on subjects, dialogue and debates relating to economics, international trade, sustainability, politics, environment, social entrepreneurship, technology, religion, health, science and business in general.

Monday, June 20, 2011

Likely unintended consequences due to failure of cross-policy making and implementation

The announcement of the new fund to be accumulate from the 3% annual net profits of companies to contribute to SMMEs funding and development is a welcome move, but personally i have my reservations.
The move is good from an ideology (transformation) perspective. And of course, finally, thank you there's now implementation taking place. The 3% has been there, as stipulated in the BBB EE Act and Code of Good Practice. It is not necessarily a new thinking, but an implementation mechanism (in a form of fund). This could have been done some few years back when the BEE regulations were enacted. My, perhaps, trillion rand question, is that why should government (ANC) always 'enter' this soft when the corporate jungle is so thick to 'penetrate'. For me the accumulation of the fund is unsustainable as a result of it appearing to be a 'choice' for corporates to comply. This thing (3% from profits for ED), first and foremost is legislated. Therefore it should not be a choice. It must be compulsory to all categorised companies with an incentive to get more BBB EEpoints. This view of mine is informed by at least the media reports. Hopefully there's more meat into it in the main document/ strategy/plan. As it stands, it looks like a choice because of a dangling carrot or the 'the low haging fruit' given to companies that they'll be awarded BBB EE scores when contributing to the fund.
The consumer driven industries are worth billions of rands annually and growing. Retail and FMCG are but two industies i can think of as examples. They dont need any BBB EE scorecard to generate billions of rands and profits for their investors. Do you think companies operating in this industries are going to contribute to this fund willingly? I know a company that generates over R5b in net profit per annum. This means it has to contribute over R150m per annum to this fund. This company is so untransformed that if the labour department and its inspectors are doing its job properly, it would fork out not less than R50m as a fine for not complying with the Commission for Employment Equity's annual EE reports submission if the EE Act (under review) provisions imposed on non-compliant companies were to be applied. That would eat heavily on their bottom line. Guaranteed, business will fight against the EE Act review of a 10% fine if this fund is to be puched hard by the government. Of course it will because there is pressure to create jobs. My suspicion is that the 'hype' of achieveing the 5m employment goal in five years will compromise the implementatin and enforcement of EE regulations compliance. So, government needs to place a watchful eye there. This fund will most probably be a best case scenario of choosing between EE compliance and ED compliance. This would point to the impact of  government's failure to thoughfully develop effective cross-policy  making. As we all know and are well-know to be doing, developing cross-cutting policies but failing to implement, this is such suspect of not winning it when it comes to implementation.